From Gateway Pundit and World Tribune
Testing on what were called “AIDS foster children” was first written about in 2005.
“VERA reported that 25 children died during the drug studies, that an additional 55 children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29 percent of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used).
“’Incarnation’s orphans live at the bottom of the American class system. Often the children of drug users, they were born into ill health and poverty. Additionally (and like all AIDS patients), these children were, because of their HIV status, written off as a loss by the medical authority, before they even got a chance to live.’
One researcher indicated the money was wasted on AIDS babies. “(If) inexpensive micronutrients and competitive disease and treatment models prove more successful than the current research, it will represent a loss of billions for the AIDS drug and research industry.”
The babies were among that class former Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg said were in those “populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
Why weren’t we paying attention? Why did we let this continue? “Well, we didn’t know,” said the German population after Hitler was dead and gone, managing to keep right arms at their sides at mention of the Fuhrer’s name.
Sixteen years ago this was reported. Until today, I had read nothing about AIDS drugs tested on babies with AIDS. Does that lack of knowledge make me complicit?
Since
1973, 62 million babies were aborted in the United States. On how many others
did the American “scientific community” perform tests, had we been asked about,
we would have said “No!”
But officials in government and in science said, "Sure. It's for science."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.