The United States does not
need and cannot afford a coast-to-coast, border-to-border high-speed rail
system.
“Warren Meyer makes the case against high speed rail,
at Coyote Blog:
"The US rail
system is optimized for freight, vs. European and Japanese systems that are
optimized for passengers. It is hard to do both well with the same network. The
US situation is actually better, much better, for energy conservation.
“The average Amtrak passenger car apparently weighs
about 65 tons (my guess is a high speed rail car weighs more). The capacity of
a coach is 70-80 passengers, which at an average adult weight of 140 pounds
yields a maximum passenger weight per car of 5.6 tons. This means that just 8%
of the fuel in a passenger train is being used to move people, the rest goes
into moving the train itself.
“Now consider a freight train. The typical car weight
25-30 tons empty and can carry between 70 and 120 tons of cargo. This means
that 70-80% of the fuel in a freight train is being used to move the cargo.
“People who insist we have a national high speed rail
network are a lot like anti-gun people, they misunderstand what little they
know. Paying passengers largely abandoned passenger rail service sixty years
ago, and it was unprofitable before then, outside the dedicated tracks serving
the densely populated DC-Boston corridor with its twelve million passengers a
year riding about 2,200 trains a day. Most "high speed rail"
elsewhere amounts to glorified trolleys running from a city to suburban towns.
“We have a rail network configured for freight trains
topping out at seventy miles an hour, so a high speed passenger system would
have to be built from the ground up, including bridges, tunnels and separation
from roads and highways. When contemplating this, remember, major destinations
in Europe are only a few hundred miles apart. A straight line about 1,500 miles
long gets you from London to Moscow. In the US it only gets you from Boston to
mid-Kansas.
“We made our choice when government built the
interstate highway system and municipal airports while the railroads financed
themselves, paid taxes and adhered to punitive regulations and labor laws, all
with government mandated rate schedules. DC came to its senses at the last
minute and realized the railroads were indispensable, collapsing and
irreplaceable. The almost supernatural efficiency of steel wheels on steel
rails saved them.
“I've driven long distances and camped out by the
tracks to witness the biggest free show on earth. I've ridden European high
speed rail too. It's impressive, classy and rightly envied. Passengers get a
serene, rock steady ride while the scenery goes by like it's coming out of a
fire hose, as does the money to pay for it. And by the way, the 'eminent
domain' to get the necessary straightaways is all but incontestable in
Europe, we'd employ every attorney in the country for decades before a mile of
track was laid.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.