By Peter
Lloyd, journalist and author based in London. Follow him on Twitter @Suffragentleman
Once again, gender
warriors in Sweden and politically motivated hacks are spreading feminist lies,
blaming men for climate change because they ‘spend more on food and cars’. This
nonsense is worse than any greenhouse gas.
Is there anything that isn’t men’s fault? In the addled minds of
hateful feminists, we are to blame for everything that’s imperfect in society –
and deserve no credit for anything that’s good.
It’s been this way since the 1960s, when crazed gender activists
first started banging on about ‘patriarchy’ and applying bizarre critical
theories to age-old relationships between the sexes.
Predictably, this
sparked a war against masculinity, which has raged on ever since and was
perhaps first defined when Valerie Solanas – founder of the Society for Cutting
Up Men – shot Andy Warhol.
Amazingly, the
premeditated attack, which took place in New York on June 3, 1968, didn’t
kill him. He survived his wounds, despite the bullet ripping through his
stomach, liver, spleen, esophagus and both lungs.
He was briefly declared dead at the
scene, but then revived by paramedics and rushed to hospital, where he spent
several weeks in intensive care.
Discharged after two months, he was
then forced to wear a corset for the rest of his life in order to keep his
organs in place. He eventually died 19 years later – in part from complications
of his appalling injuries.
In other words, feminism didn’t kill Andy
Warhol immediately, but instead, it killed him slowly, over a long period of
time.
Now, some 50 years later, the same
thing is happening again – but, this time, it’s the male psyche that’s being
targeted. And, instead of ballistics, they’re using political propaganda, which
they hope will destabilize masculinity, spark a cultural coup and allow women
to inherit the Earth.
I appreciate that sounds like a crazed
conspiracy theory, but the evidence is everywhere.
Don’t believe me? Go and see for
yourself. Open any newspaper, magazine or website and see the psychological
warfare and the mind games. The encouragement to surrender our will and
self-respect will be obvious.
The latest example of this is the
ludicrous and sexist claim that
men cause more climate emissions than women.
According to so-called experts from
Sweden, we spend more on petrol, eat more meat and go on greater numbers of
long-haul trips.
Whatever the claims, it’s merely the
foregone conclusion of the latest ‘study’ by research company Ecoloop, which –
surprise, surprise – is run by feminists with
an agenda.
“We think it’s important to take the
difference between men and women into account in policy making,” said Annika
Carlsson Kanyama, who led the ‘research’.
“The way they spend is very
stereotypical – women spend more money on home decoration, health and clothes
and men spend more money on fuel for cars, eating out, alcohol and tobacco.”
My response? F**k
right off.
Like most sane
people, I am sick of the endless hatred and criticism of men, who have built
Western civilization from scratch and repeatedly protected it by sacrificing
their lives on battlefields.
Besides, let’s have a
reality check on who are the worst offenders regarding climate change...
· It’s women who destroy the ozone with their hairspray and
perfumes. It’s women whose soiled sanitary products end up in the oceans or
creating fatbergs in our sewers that men, not women, are forced to remove.
· It’s predominately women’s vain consumption of trashy fashion
magazines, such as Vogue and Cosmopolitan, plus endless chick-lit books that
cause rainforest trees to be chopped down, pulped and made into paper.
According to the World Wildlife Federation, a chunk of forest the size of a
football pitch is felled every two seconds for this purpose. So why don’t
women stop buying crap books such as ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’? As of October
2017, that series had shifted 150 million copies, which is a lot of trees.
· Greta Thunberg, who is female, constantly travels the world, which
suggests she has a carbon footprint far bigger than the average teenage
boy.
But, more than anything else, it’s exclusively
women who keep giving birth to babies, despite the fact we live in an
over-populated world.
Adding to this is the fact that, because of the gendered life
expectancy gap, there are far more women alive than men. This means that more
women are discarding crap into landfills, more women are failing to recycle and
more women are consuming fossil fuel energy, such as gas /and electricity.
Given that humans – not animals – are plundering Earth’s
resources, and women are the majority of humans on Earth, perhaps the blame
lies with them, not us.
Then again, if the planet does get destroyed and we all die,
it won’t be all bad: at least we won’t have to listen to man-hating feminists
and their endless attempts to shoot us down.
You know, just like
Andy Warhol.
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/530492-feminist-blaming-men-climate-change
