“The
state of Oklahoma can legally bar state agents from enforcing federal gun
control. Refusal to cooperate with federal enforcement rests on a
well-established legal principle known as the anti-commandeering doctrine.
“Simply
put, the federal government cannot force states to help implement or enforce
any federal act or program. The anti-commandeering doctrine is based
primarily on five Supreme Court cases dating back to 1842. Printz v. U.S. serves
as the cornerstone.
“’We
held in New York that Congress cannot compel the States to enact or enforce a
federal regulatory program. Today we hold that Congress cannot circumvent that
prohibition by conscripting the States’ officers directly. The Federal
Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address
particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their
political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program.
It matters not whether policy making is involved, and no case by case weighing
of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands are fundamentally
incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereignty.’”
Link at
woodpilereport.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.