Showing posts with label gun control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gun control. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

He's not a real Jersey boy


Yesterday I sent an email to the governor of New Jersey. The letter said, “All residents who own firearms magazines of greater than 10-round capacity will turn in those magazines.” HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Reply received today: “Submission of Application for Robert C. Merriman

“Dear Robert: Thank you for reaching out. Our office has begun processing your request and will respond as soon as possible.”

First, I did not submit an application for anything, but simply indicated my belief that Phil Murphy is a threat to his state and to the Republic.

Second, I never reach out to anybody. “Reaching out” is a liberal’s way of trying to make everything nicey-nicey while ignoring their efforts at controlling all we do.





Monday, November 26, 2018

More legal guns, less violent crime


NRA propaganda? Nope. Studies by the UN and our own Centers for Disease Control.

“Norway, Finland, Germany, France and Denmark, which have high rates of gun ownership, have low murder rates. On the other hand, in Luxembourg, where handguns are totally banned and ownership of any kind of gun is minimal, the murder rate is nine times higher than Germany. Their source of information? The United Nations' International Study on Firearms Regulation, published by the UN's Economic and Social Council and the United Nations Commission on Crime-Prevention and Criminal Justice.
“When Kates and Mauser compared England with the United States, they found ’a negative correlation,’ that is, ‘where firearms are most dense violent crime rates are lowest, and where guns are least dense, violent crime rates are highest.’ There is no consistent significant positive association between gun ownership levels and violence rates.”


A longish read, but worth the time.




Thursday, June 23, 2016

Dems don’t get gun control, but by golly they get to sing ‘We Shall Overcome’

Pimp and circumcision, as a friend called it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/24/us/politics/senate-gun-control.html?_r=0


Democratic representatives continuing to pimp old ideas while cutting any possible meaningful legislation.

“We shall get a bill someday.”

Right. And keep on with that “We need gun control so no more people of color are murdered.” Because we know white Republicans gun down not-white people by the dozens every day. Reports are chock-full of white Republicans who Cadillac into not-white neighborhoods, indiscriminately spraying lead bullets from assault rifles and other machine guns.

Pictures of the House Democrats show people oh-so angered and disgusted, faces with true righteous indignation because the Republican majority will not listen to the will of the people.

I am laughing.

Sunday, February 14, 2016

I got your gun control right here

‘Three Basic Facts About The Right To Bear Arms’

So says the U.S. Supreme Court.

http://lidblog.com/three-basic-facts-about-the-right-to-bear-arms/#

Link at http://ace.mu.nu/#361458

The most important part: The right to bear arms is a pre-existing right, a right that existed before written into the Bill of Rights.



Friday, April 19, 2013

Gun control

VP Biden: "Look I know you're going to say that I'm just being an optimist and I'm trying to put a good face on this. But you know I've been around here a long time and we've already done, because of you, some really good things. Number one, the president is already lining up some additional executive actions he's going to be taking later this week."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/biden-president-already-lining-some-additional-executive-actions-guns_718027.html

Link at http://www.drudgereport.com/

And: Pelosi counting on “public outrage.”

“House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday said passage of tougher gun controls is ‘inevitable,’ projecting optimism less than 24 hours after the Senate voted down legislation central to President Obama's strategy to reduce gun violence.

"’It's a matter of time," Pelosi said Thursday during a press briefing in the Capitol. ‘It might be inconceivable to the NRA that this might happen; it's inevitable to us.’

“Pelosi did not put a timeline on her prediction but suggested public outrage over the failed Senate effort will eventually force the opponents of tougher gun laws to reconsider.”


http://thehill.com/homenews/house/294799-pelosi-tougher-gun-controls-inevitable#ixzz2QwnjyKV5


In the Pelosi story, The Hill writer claims 93 percent of Americans favour increased background checks. But in a story at The American Interest, we learn: “A Gallup poll on Monday found that after weeks of heated MSM coverage only 4 percent of Americans regard gun control as the nation’s most pressing issue. We would not be surprised if many people in that 4 percent opposed gun control.”

Now, the Gallup poll asked about “the nation’s most pressing issue.” From the 4 percent return on gun control, the polled public has a far different view than do newspeople and the White House.

http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2013/04/18/gun-control-vote-exposes-clueless-msm/


A few days ago another man who had done a Vietnam vacation told me that when Australia decided to be a Gun Free Zone, blue-helmeted soldiers went in and seized guns from those citizens who declined to give up their pistols, rifles, shotguns and etc. Amazing what you can find out at Walmart.

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Ah, Mr. President. About those AK-47s ...

“OBAMA: I, like most Americans, believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual the right to bear arms. And we recognize the traditions of gun ownership that passed on from generation to generation -– that hunting and shooting are part of a cherished national heritage.

“But I also believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals –– that they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities. …”

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021024123

(A couple of things: As usual, the president makes himself the focus of what he is about to say. “I, like most Americans …” and not “Like most Americans, I …” Second, the web site is pro-Obama, or at least anti-Romney, and writers see nothing wrong with Obama saying an AK-47 is a soldier’s weapon. Yeah, but which army? A third thing: “Second Amendment … right to bear arms … hunting and shooting …” Yes, there is a Second Amendment; yes, people have a right to own guns; and, yes, people have a right to hunt and otherwise shoot their guns.)

From This Ain’t Hell:

“If in fact the Colorado killer used an AK 47, then our really lame president should have noted that the assault weapon used in this slaughter was one used by America’s enemies for the past half century to thwart American interests around the globe, distributed indiscriminately by the Russians and China to any and all who would take up arms against the Great Satan. He should have made note that this is a weapon imported from Eastern Europe or Asia most likely, not an American weapon of choice. It is a garbage bin weapon easily acquired by any mad man in any country of the world.”

A President is Known by the Weapons He Chooses…

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

US to Europe: - - - - off!

‘If Only America Was More Like Brussels’

“Why does America so fear to be like us? It can’t just be the Second Amendment, regardless of what it is supposed to mean. True, the American tendency to treat their constitution as a holy text is baffling at the best of times. (Who cares what Thomas Jefferson meant in 1787? Maybe he hadn’t given people bringing semi-automatic weaponry into cinemas that much thought?) But this surely goes deeper.

“Much as it might look that way, America’s debate about gun control isn’t really about being able to defend yourself (as part of a militia or otherwise) from the inevitable tyrannical government when the Muslims and/or Jews take over. It’s about freedom, and freedom of a very particular sort. It’s about the rights of the individual versus the greater good. America just doesn’t seem to do the latter...”

http://www.anenglishmanscastle.com/

(I tried to get the whole column through The Times, but the site wanted a subscription, which would mean giving out more information than I am comfortable with. An Englishman’s Castle has a good bit of the column.)