So now the Gosnell trial will get more coverage

But MSM writers aren’t looking at the murder aspects? Not so much as how Gosnell’s actions will affect abortion rights.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/04/13/Media-Acknowledge-Blowing-Gosnell-Story-Pledge-Extensive-Coverage

Megan McArdle, The Daily Beast: I can't bring myself to describe them … The truth is that most of us tend to be less interested in sick-making stories—if the sick-making was done by "our side." Moreover, surely those of us who are pro-choice must worry that this will restrict access to abortion: that a crackdown on abortion clinics will follow, with onerous white-glove inspections; that a revolted public will demand more restrictions on late-term abortions; or that women will be too afraid of Gosnell-style crimes to seek a medically necessary abortion.

And, McArdle said, descriptions made her ill. “I can't bring myself to describe them … The truth is that most of us tend to be less interested in sick-making stories—if the sick-making was done by ‘our side.’"

So McArdle discovered something: Bad things happen in an abortion. She would not admit that a “baby” died. “It suggests that sometimes, those fetuses are delivered alive.”

As John Nolte says at breitbart, “the left-wing media” will “spin the Gosnell horrors into a pro-choice argument for safer abortion clinics.”

But, he adds, “What is also likely to happen is an increased public knowledge of the act of outright infanticide known as partial-birth abortion. For over a decade now, the media has tried to turn that horror into a ‘right-wing myth.’ But now we not only have an example of a doctor eagerly engaged and made wealthy by the practice, but other doctors referring patients to him.”

Link at www.maggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com