‘Weaker men more likely to support welfare state and wealth redistribution’
“Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.
“Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to physical strength.
“Men's upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic redistribution, according to the research.”
Two “psychological scientists” conducted research/studies in the United States, Denmark and Argentina. Most conclusions lead to “And you’re surprised?”, while another leads to “You’d be short some smart fuses if you thought otherwise.”
This conclusion: “In line with their hypotheses, the data revealed that wealthy men with high upper-body strength were less likely to support redistribution, while less wealthy men of the same strength were more likely to support it.” Oh. I am rich and I am strong and I will fight against government taking my money and giving it to someone else, and you researchers are surprised.
Found at http://thisainthell.us/
Sort of like A History Lesson?
Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.
Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement.
Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement.