https://gunfreezone.net/garbage-science-is-garbage/
The crux of the story: “Nearly 900
people reported abnormal menstrual cycles, including intense cramping and
increased bleeding, that began or persisted days after their initial exposure
to the teargas. Hundreds of others complained of other negative health impacts,
including severe headaches, nausea, diarrhea, and mental health concerns.”
Love the headline: ‘Hundreds
report abnormal menstruation after being teargassed during Portland protests’
Got that?
“The new research, based on an online survey of more than 2,200 people, challenges claims that
the health consequences of being teargassed are minor and temporary, said Dr
Britta Torgrimson-Ojerio, a researcher at Kaiser Permanente Northwest and the
lead author of the study.”
Way down in the
story, we get this admission: “The new study, published in BMC Public
Health, has some limitations. The
results are based on an anonymous online survey, so researchers were not able
to independently confirm the identities of the respondents, Torgrimson-Ojerio said.”
Uh, since when
does an “anonymous online survey” constitute a viable study? Is this “New
Science”? Maybe like the mathematical proof CISS – Cause I Said So.
The focus of the
“report” in a nutshell: “The po-leece are allies in the Republican Party’s war
on women.”
Hey, an "online" survey is par for the course with China Wuhan Virus "science."
ReplyDeleteI was almost surprised that an organization as big as Kaiser Permanente would base a "study" from an online survey, but that kind of thing is modern science. Or something.
ReplyDelete